My Research

Adressing Wicked Problems of Sustainable Development

My academic motivation is understanding how organizations address complex societal challenges and wicked problems, specifically how such approaches lead to unintended consequences or perpetuate grand challenges. As a theoretical lens, I focus on the emergence of (paradoxical) tensions within organizations and interorganizational collaborations and networks and how these tensions and competing demands can be addressed. In particular, I examine the intersections of businesses, NGOs, and public authorities and the perspective of multi-stakeholder initiatives. 

 

I focus on qualitative, ethnographic research, which enables me to understand issues on-site and observe and learn how actors engage with these challenges through everyday practices, routines, and sense-making. Following this philosophy, I thrive working with people from various backgrounds, both academics and practitioners and I draw a lot of energy from engaging in research collaboration. 

 

My Publications

Blinded by the Light: A critique on the universality, normativity, and hegemony of paradox theory and research

Seidemann, I. (2024). Blinded by the Light: A Critique on the Universality, Normativity, and Hegemony of Paradox Theory and Research, Organization Theory, https://doi.org/10.1177/26317877241290248

This paper intervenes in paradox theory and research by problematizing the taken-for-granted premises that currently dominate the field. Building on the “growing pains” of paradox theory, the paper offers three provocations for current paradox theory and research: it questions the conceptual universality of paradox, reveals the implicit normativity of some of its key assumptions, and problematizes the hegemony of the conception of both/and as core to responses to paradox. Deliberately stepping beyond the established guardrails of paradox theory, the paper critically assesses these premises and reflects on their potential risks and blind spots. Building on these three provocations, the paper offers in turn a set of distinct pathways for theoretical development, including interpreting presupposed features of paradox in light of ontological positions, integrating normative approaches into paradox management, and introducing much greater granularity to the study of paradox responses.


2024

Conceptual foundations of workforce homogeneity in the public sector. Insights from a systematic review oncauses, consequences, and blind spots

Seidemann, I. & Weißmüller, K. (2024). Conceptual Foundations of Workforce Homogeneity in the Public Sector. Insights from a Systematic Review on Causes, Consequences, and Blind Spots, Public Management Review, https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2022.2084770

Workforce diversity is a key objective of public personnel policies worldwide. Weaugment this discourse by exploring the complementary and multifaceted conceptof workforce homogeneity. This systematic literature review clarifies an elusive conceptand reveals dominant causes and consequences of public sector workforce homo-geneity, synthesizing how self-selection, personnel policies, and socialization createoften implicit yet persistent practices that lead to workforce homogeneity. By linkingthese causes with their (un-)intended consequences, this study on workforce homo-geneity sheds light on an important theoretical concept for public management andidentifies broad avenues for future research.


2024

System Level Dynamics in the Emergence and Navigation of Multi-Actor Paradoxes

Seidemann, I., Geiger, D., & Harborth, L. (2023). System Level Dynamics in the Emergence and Navigation of Multi-Actor Paradoxes. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2023(1), https://doi.org/10.5465/AMPROC.2023.77bp

In this paper, we bridge the gap between paradox theory and a system level perspective to study how system level dynamics initiate and drive multi actor paradoxes in the response to the grand challenge of climate-induced disasters. We show how multiple actors engage in contradictory yet interrelated practices that fuel paradoxical dynamics and finally create a non-optimal but stable equilibrium that inhibits system change. We explore this process through a longitudinal ethnography study on the implementation of the “Forecast-based-Financing” approach in Uganda; an approach that shall initiate early action in anticipation of disasters. Our findings reveal how stakeholders’ implementation practices drive paradoxical dynamics that constitute self-reinforcing dynamics. Drawing on these insights, we develop a process model that explains how paradoxical dynamics not only hinder the tackling of the grand challenge but stabilize each other, contributing to a path dependent development. We contribute to theory in at least two ways: first, we theorize how addressing grand challenges instigates an interplay of paradoxical dynamics which create non-optimal but stable, path dependent equilibria on a system level which are difficult to change. Second, we introduce a dynamic perspective on paradoxes, thereby moving beyond the perspective of stable paradox poles that can be embraced.


2023

© 2025 Dr. Iris Seidemann  Privacy Policy  Contact

Wir benötigen Ihre Zustimmung zum Laden der Übersetzungen

Wir nutzen einen Drittanbieter-Service, um den Inhalt der Website zu übersetzen, der möglicherweise Daten über Ihre Aktivitäten sammelt. Bitte überprüfen Sie die Details in der Datenschutzerklärung und akzeptieren Sie den Dienst, um die Übersetzungen zu sehen.